The Black Legend (Spanish: La leyenda negra), or the Spanish Black Legend, is a theorised historiographical tendency consisting of anti-Spanish and anti-Catholic blogger.com proponents claim that its roots date back to the 16th century, when it was originally a political and psychological weapon that was used by Spain's northern European rivals in order to demonize the Spanish Empire, its Jun 15, · This is not a case of people being mean to other people, it’s coordinated, anti-democratic, anti-free press propaganda, ironically weaponizing the language and methods of the free press. It is a form of warfare, except it’s not engineered by countries to attack other countries - it’s private enterprises and individuals bringing war to the The war began in and ended in This historical period was the era of the Cold War, which was characterized by a lot of tension between the United States and Soviet Union. The Vietnam War took place in Vietnam, and was extended in Laos and Cambodia. The Vietnam War is also known as Vietnam Conflict and Second Indochina War
Gold Rush and Anti-Chinese Race Hatred -
The latest in the near-endless flow of bad faith attacks on the media erupted last week in a coordinated attack on New York Times reporter Mara Gay. Gay made comments on MSNBC around the growth of white nationalismspecifically mentioning the American flag:. I saw, you know, anti war essay, dozens and dozens of pickup trucks with explicatives [sic] against Joe Biden on the back of them, Trump flags, and in some cases just dozens of American flags, which is also just disturbing … Essentially the message was clear: This is my country.
This is not your country. As usual, the right wing media Fox, New York Post, anti war essay. The problem here is that, as usual with these comments, they are defensive and passive, and fail to address the core problems of what happened.
By treating these outlets as if they are operating to journalistic standards, as full participants in the free press, the Times is simply continuing to give them power. It is a form of war in which reporters are treated as if the problem is being attacked online. And yes, this is a war, and it is a war being fought by the New York Post, by Fox News, and by many solo writers that have found a successful career anti war essay joining these campaigns, because outrage breeds clicks, anti war essay.
They continually dance around half-truths and bad faith readings, and nobody on their side gives a shit about objectivity or balance - they care about winning their culture and ideological war, which involves but is not limited to the diminishment and eventual destruction of outlets like the New York Times and Washington Post, and anyone else who disagrees with them - which is coincidentally exactly what they claim is happening to them.
Sottek at The Verge wrote a great piece in February around how these campaigns operate, and how news organizations continually fail to support and understand these problems. And I quote:. These bad faith attacks target what many newsrooms value: fairness and impartiality. But all reporters have opinions and feelings; becoming a journalist does not mean giving up being human, anti war essay.
By pretending to speak the language of editorial values, trolls and organized adversaries have baited newsroom leaders into failing to protect their reporters. They want to intimidate us and have us disavow our colleagues. This is propaganda for a war against free speech, anti war essay, to directly and effectively! disempower reporters at publications that are considered threats to their ideal democracy what they consider a democracy but is actually a plutocracy, or an autocracy.
They are deliberate, anti war essay, they are organized, they are regimented, anti war essay, they have the same talking points and roughly the same thoughts. Like it or not, many of us rely on sources of information that we find online to verify the things that we share and take our information from, and when those sources of information are taking it from sources with an active agenda or have themselvesmany millions of people are happy to follow along.
It is the nature of influence and social media - we follow those we trust and appreciate, and thus choose to believe that the sources of information they draw upon are valid and interrogated. Take the Taylor Lorenz Clubhouse situation, anti war essay. What started with Taylor misattributing a vile word said by Horowitz to Anti war essay both co-partners of a multi-billion dollar VC in a single tweet which she immediately deleted and corrected within minutes, became national news as it traveled from Twitter to Glenn Greenwald to Tucker Carlson, anti war essay.
All of this anti war essay legitimized by anti war essay Times not really…doing anything. Their statement :. Journalists should be able to do their jobs without facing harassment.
Who gives a single fuck no offense Taylor about her talent. Why are there no letters from the editor? Why is the weight of this masthead not used to fight what is, at its core, an attack on free press? The important part anti war essay their weaponization that they rely on is their legitimacy.
As a result, the center and left publications are regularly on the defensive, anti war essay to find ways to provide a college essay-style retort to someone who has no interest in an actual debate, and no real way to be proved wrong. This is propaganda. Treating it as such is the first step to making things better. Despite being titanic news organizations with global power and resources, anti war essay outlets who have staff harassed act as if the staffers are at fault, somehow.
That is not what they were doing! That is not the point of the segment! The point of the segment was to scare and upset Mara because she suggested that there is a white supremacy problem in America, anti war essay, and that the flag was used as a symbol! The problem is that the Times, even when decrying these bad faith attacksfails to truly address them, anti war essay. If you truly have faith in your reporters and your reporting, you should not be updating or explaining their actions based on people being upset with them, unless there are clear facts that challenge the reporting as opposed to rhetoric and opinions.
These large organizations need to invest significantly in exhaustive, organization-wide education about how these online culture war campaigns start, what they do, what their goals are intimidating critics and would-be critics and are not their goals are not reporting, or correcting facts, for examplethe language and means they use to execute, anti war essay, and how they use the newsroom against itself.
From the top of the organization there needs to be an appreciation and education of how these campaigns form and what they do, and the responses need to be from a position of power. These outlets that deliberately, directly and maliciously attack reporters, need to be addressed with a response that directly attacks the root of the problem and acknowledges the forces that push the narrative.
When a right wing outlet or influencer decides to spend time attacking a specific reporter, an outlet should respond with force, calling the outlet and anyone involved what they are - charlatans seeking to profit off of misery and fear, peddling propaganda to keep those in power powerful and suppress equality. I refuse to believe that the New York Anti war essay, Washington Post and other major outlets have no ability to meet with Twitter and Facebook directly about how their platforms are used to distribute this propaganda.
It is misinformationand yet still propaganda - it is very specific reads of very specific subjects, with a thought process that focuses on engagement using the continual fuel of human suffering. Twitter and others must be pressured to limit its spread, and actively punish those who engage in it. Similarly, if outlets are continually running links about how bad one specific person is, and yes, you will have to read more deeply than just the headline, suppress the spread too.
They need to commit advertising dollars to explaining how these campaigns form and are executed, and anti war essay need to put the force of the Editorial Board behind explaining and calling out these actors. Social networks need to actively punish and deverify those who continually engage in these targeted propaganda campaigns, and accept them for what they are - a manipulation of free speech. They are defended as if they are free speech, but they seek to condense and eradicate the speech of others.
Outlets that fuel this fire must no longer be considered respected peers, but agitators that operate using the anti war essay mechanisms as a free press. Their agendas must be interrogated along with their participants, and when reporters are targeted, newsrooms must be on the offensive - instead of defending the reporter, they should directly attack the way in which the reporter was attacked, and interrogate what the aggressor has to gain from doing so.
These propaganda peddlers will argue that this is an attack on the free press, and the response should be anti war essay they are engaging in targeted misinformation campaigns, anti war essay, and they are being dealt with as such. The big mistake is framing these responses to people like Mara Gay as a discussion or as an act of journalism. They are, at their core, an attempt to spread statements about reporters being weak, or biased, anti war essay, or not objective, so that the greater institution of the New York Times as well as other women or people of color in journalism looks bad.
This is a war, a war fought by anti war essay that seek only to protect their own selfish interests in the most cruel, manipulative way possible. They have no interest in balance, anti war essay, or fairness, anti war essay, or democracy, or free speech, or anything other than protecting the agendas of those that they have projected themselves onto, anti war essay.
This discord, this direct assault on people and newsrooms, only exists to enrich and reinforce the power structures that are used to suppress free thought, ironically using the terminology and linguistics that have been used to defend free speech for centuries.
Click the link we sent toor anti war essay here to log in. Your position is literally and objectively "liberal reporters cannot be criticized. PS you're a middle aged man.
She put words in the mouths of the protestors while saying she was intimidated people who were waving the American flag: "Essentially the message was clear: This is my country. I own this. This is not fact based, anti war essay, it's her feelings that Trump supporters waving American flags are bad. Keep pushing the "white supremacist" boogeyman as you try to ostracize people with different viewpoints than your own.
Anti war essay for censorship holy moly has the far left has shifted into open advocation for illiberal practices. Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At Subscribe. About Archive Help Log in, anti war essay.
Newsrooms Need To Treat Coordinated Online Attacks On Anti war essay Like Propaganda - And Act Like They're At War Ed Z. June 8th Retweets 2, Likes, anti war essay. Create your profile Set photo. Only paying subscribers can comment on this post Already a paying subscriber? Log in. Check your email For your security, we need to re-authenticate you. Freddie deBoer. S John.
Is this a joke? If not anti war essay is a "bad faith" argument. Top New Community What is Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At? Ready for more? See privacyterms and information collection notice. Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At is on Substack — the place for independent writing. This site requires JavaScript to run correctly.
Please turn on JavaScript or unblock scripts. Comment Share Share. Freddie deBoer Jun 21 Your position is literally and objectively "liberal reporters cannot be criticized. S John Jun 18 Is this a joke?
The Art of (Anti-)War
, time: 6:51The Vietnam War () essay
Apr 27, · Anti-vaccine disinformation has turned reasonable questions and concerns over rare side effects into conspiracy worries, exaggerated fears, and outrage at being treated like ‘guinea pigs’ Executive Order , signed in by President Truman, called for a loyalty investigation of all federal employees. Truman hoped that these investigations would help to rally public opinion behind his Cold War policies, while quieting those on the right who thought that the Democrats were soft on Communism Within a short time the Frenchman, the Mexican and the Chileño had been driven out and the full force of this anti-foreign persecution fell upon the unfortunate Chinaman. From the beginning, though well received, the Chinese had been a race apart. Their peculiar dress and pigtail marked them off from the rest of the population
No comments:
Post a Comment